The Supreme Court in India on Wednesday directed the Speaker of the Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly to decide the disqualification petition against Bina MLA Nirmala Sapre within two months.
Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice V Mohana passed the order on a petition filed by Leader of Opposition Umang Singhar.
Petition pending since July 2024
Singhar, who is a Congress leader, alleged that Sapre was elected from Bina in the 2023 Assembly polls on an Indian National Congress ticket. According to the plea, she later voluntarily relinquished membership of the Congress. The plea further states that she joined the Bharatiya Janata Party after her election. The petitioner contends that such conduct attracts disqualification under the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution of India. The disqualification petition has remained pending before the Speaker since July 2024. Singhar sought a time-bound disposal of the petition pending before the constitutional authority. The matter reached the Supreme Court after the High Court refused to ensure a speedy decision on the pending petition.
The Bench expressed displeasure over the delay in disposal of the petition. It also expressed displeasure over the refusal by the Madhya Pradesh High Court to ensure a speedy decision on the matter. The Bench said pleas filed under the Tenth Schedule must be decided expeditiously. It said expedition is required even if there is no immediate urgency in the matter. The Court made clear that it has expressed no view on whether Sapre has incurred disqualification.
No finding on voluntary relinquishment or joining another party has been recorded by the Supreme Court. It left that question entirely for the Speaker to decide in accordance with law. The decision of the Speaker will determine whether the Bina seat attracts disqualification under the Tenth Schedule. The Speaker is now required to take a decision on the petition filed by Singhar within the two-month period fixed by the order.
NewsSupreme Court Seeks Centre, ECI Reply On Plea Against Immunity For CEC And ECs
4 Nov 2026
NewsSupreme Court Orders Special Cell To Monitor Child Labour Law Enforcement
4 Nov 2026
NewsBail Cannot Rest On Judge's Personal Notions Of Morality, Rules Supreme Court
4 Nov 2026
NewsSupreme Court Refers Two-Child Norm Penalties To Larger Bench As Outdated
4 Nov 2026
NewsCommercial Rival Cannot Appeal Grant of Insecticide Registration, Rules Supreme Court
4 Nov 2026
NewsKarnataka High Court Opens Suo Motu PIL On Violence Against Advocates
4 Nov 2026
NewsKarnataka High Court Grants Bail To Lawyer Accused Of Seeking Bribe In Judge's Name
4 Nov 2026
NewsKarnataka High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Against Modinno Innovations
4 Nov 2026
LawWorld Pro
Research, drafting and case management for the whole practice.
₹1,500 per month, or ₹12,000 per year — save 33%. 1 user, 250 active cases, 10 GB. Prices exclusive of 18% GST.
Comments
Sign in to read the discussion and share your thoughts.
Latest from LawWorld
News
View all- Supreme Court Seeks Centre, ECI Reply On Plea Against Immunity For CEC And ECs4 Nov 2026
- Supreme Court Orders Special Cell To Monitor Child Labour Law Enforcement4 Nov 2026
- Bail Cannot Rest On Judge's Personal Notions Of Morality, Rules Supreme Court4 Nov 2026
- Supreme Court Refers Two-Child Norm Penalties To Larger Bench As Outdated4 Nov 2026
- Commercial Rival Cannot Appeal Grant of Insecticide Registration, Rules Supreme Court4 Nov 2026
